Practice Areas
Blog 
Class Actions
News
Nichols Aluminum Class Action Lawsuit...
Posted on 4/11/2012
Iowa Class Action Suit Claims Defective Flea and Tick Medication Causes Death and Injuries to Dogs...
Posted on 7/8/2011
Iowa-Based Company at Center of Class Action Suit...
Posted on 6/4/2011
Iowa Employees Involved in Class Action Lawsuit with Wal-Mart Reached Settlement...
Posted on 5/5/2011
Six Plaintiffs Request Class Action Certification Against Apartments Downtown in Iowa City...
Posted on 3/5/2011
Iowa Elderly Residents Seek Class Action Certification in BedBug Lawsuit...
Posted on 2/19/2011
Farmers’ Class Action Lawsuit Frowned Upon by Iowa Congressman...
Posted on 1/21/2011
Oscar Mayer Involved in Iowa Class Action Lawsuit...
Posted on 12/2/2010
Supreme Court Argument Suggests Consumer Class Actions Will Survive...
Posted on 11/11/2010
Court approves dietary supplement consumer fraud class action...
Posted on 10/5/2010
Library
Class Actions
Iowa Legal News | Cedar Rapids Lawsuit News
Supreme Court Argument Suggests Consumer Class Actions Will Survive
Posted on Nov 11, 2010
On Tuesday, November 9, 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion. The case involved an effort by AT&T to prohibit class actions in an arbitration clause of contracts with mobile phone customers. California courts had held that the class action bar was unconscionable and unenforceable.
Before the oral argument, many expected the conservative U.S. Supreme Court to reverse the lower court’s decision and allow such clauses in boilerplate print of consumer contracts, even where they might be unenforceable under state law standards. However, comments of most of the justices during oral arguments, including conservative Justice Antonin Scalia, suggest the court may defer to state court judges’ determinations about what is and is not fundamentally unfair in a consumer contract.
The lawyer for the California couple, who had filed the class action against AT&T Mobility claiming that they were defrauded over a $30 charge, told the court that a decision in favor of AT&T would “gut the state’s substantive consumer protection law.” Although recent Supreme Court decisions have suggested the court would enforce arbitration agreements and disfavor consumer class actions, the justices’ questions at oral argument suggested otherwise. For example, Justice Antonin Scalia, a noted conservative on the court, asked AT&T’s attorney, “Are we going to tell the State of California what it has to consider unconscionable?” Questions by Justice Breyer, Justice Bader Ginsburg and new Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan were similar in tone. Questions from conservative Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr., indicated support for AT&T and suggest that the opinion may be divided.
Numerous consumer groups, including the Legal Aid Society of the District of Columbia, AARP, Centers for Responsible Lending and the Consumer Federation of America have expressed support for the Concepcions and the California lower court’s rulings rejecting the arbitration clauses.
Read More About Supreme Court Argument Suggests Consumer Class Actions Will Survive...
Free
Case Consultation
Contact us today for a free, no obligation consultation about your personal injury legal needs.
Brady & O'Shea, PC
2735 1st Avenue SE
Cedar Rapids, IA 52402
Phone: 319-866-9277
Fax: 319-866-9280
Get Directions
Social Media
